Google abused a monopoly in Internet search and its market power to consolidate that position, a US court has ruled. It was previously unclear which specific measures would accompany the ruling. However, the US Department of Justice is now advocating for the sale of the Google Chrome browser.
US judge Amit Mehta challenged Google in a nearly 300-page long Verdict not only certified a monopoly in Internet searches, but also ruled that the company had abused its market power to consolidate this position. For example, the US company pays a lot of money to be the default search engine on Apple devices. The same applies to the Firefox browser.
Monopoly verdict: Does Google have to sell its Chrome browser?
First of all, there are no consequences from the monopoly ruling. Specific measures should be clarified in a further procedure. Google will likely appeal both cases, which in turn could result in a lawsuit that will last years, if not decades.
However, the US Department of Justice is now apparently advocating that Alphabet subsidiary Google must sell its Internet browser Chrome for antitrust reasons. That comes from one report the news agency Bloomberg citing insiders.
Accordingly, the ministry wants to ask Judge Amit Mehta in follow-up proceedings to initiate the Chrome sale. The entire procedure is considered “Process of the decade“, as this could result in the breakup of Google or its parent company Alphabet.
Google describes the approach as a “radical agenda”
The US Department of Justice is apparently also seeking measures against the Android operating system. Like the news agency Reuters reportedHowever, the authority declined to comment. In response to a query, Google described the approach as a “radical agenda that goes far beyond the legal issues in this case” and would harm consumers.
The company reiterated its intention to appeal. Background: Google Chrome is the most used web browser with a market share of around 60 percent in the USA and around two thirds worldwide.
The competition watchdog could argue that many users access Google’s search engine via Chrome. Considerations are being made to initiate a separation of Google and the Android operating system as measures Bloomberg however, has been dropped.
Also interesting:
- Elon Musk changed Twitter algorithms to influence US election
- If Trump shuts down search engines, “we’ll have to go back to phone books”
- Meta, OpenAI and Anthropic sell their AI models to the US military
- Sources of Search GPT: OpenAI’s AI search is absolutely dubious!
The article “Trial of the decade”: Does Google have to sell its Chrome browser? by Fabian Peters first appeared on BASIC thinking. Follow us too Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
As a Tech Industry expert, I believe that the idea of Google being forced to sell its Chrome browser as a result of the “Trial of the decade” is highly unlikely. While antitrust concerns have been raised about Google’s dominant position in the browser market, it is important to note that Chrome is a free product and users have the choice to use alternative browsers if they so wish.
Additionally, Google’s dominance in the browser market has been largely driven by its innovative features and user-friendly interface, rather than anti-competitive practices. The company has also faced competition from other major players in the browser market, such as Mozilla Firefox and Microsoft Edge.
Overall, I believe that any potential trial involving Google and its Chrome browser would need to carefully consider the impact on competition and innovation in the tech industry, rather than simply focusing on breaking up a successful product. Ultimately, I do not see Google being forced to sell its Chrome browser as a likely outcome of any antitrust proceedings.
Credits