The article Chatgpt as a therapist: Ki knows no confidentiality first appeared at the online magazine Basic Thinking. You can start the day well every morning via our newsletter update.
More and more people are using Chatgpt for self -therapy – for example to process or combat fears and depression. Sam Altman has now warned that Openai cannot guarantee the security of sensitive data such as personal health information. At the same time, he calls for a kind of confidentiality for chatt – as with therapists, lawyers or doctors. In our format “Break the News” we decrypted the background.
Background: Chatgpt as a therapist
- Via social media, more and more people report that they use chatt for self -therapy. On possible Data protection risks are only a few. Another problem is bad advice, incorrect information or invented content through AI distortions or hallucinations. In short: moments when Chatgpt could use a therapist himself. A confidentiality? For this reason alone is questionable.
- Studies have already proven that AI tools like Chatgpt have a Can complement and even improve therapy sensibly. A person or even psychologist can artificial intelligence but do not replace. Means: A real therapist should decide whether and to what extent Chatgpt can be a supplement or not.
- The Data protection guidelines from Openaai According to Chats at Chatgpt deleted within 30 days. However, only if you have deleted them yourself beforehand. Officially only restriction: If the company is obliged to keep chats for longer for “legal or security -relevant reasons”.
Classification: Dr. Google sends regards
Dr. Google should actually be a warning example. Because just as little as the Internet, Chatgpt can replace real therapy. Especially not because such chatbots access information that can also be found on Google – they just pack them differently.
In addition, there are technical drops such as distortions and hallucinations. The low -threshold access and the supposed intelligence of AI However, many people can tempt you to do without real therapy – whether out of shame, fear or simply due to the lack of therapy places and long waiting times.
But that is exactly what reveals that actual problem. Because chatt therapy is not just a self-help trend, but also a symptom. The search for therapy alternatives is understandable, but the lesser evil is not automatically the better-Also should warn Altman.
Voices
- Openai boss Sam Altman warned in one Podcast Before discussions with chatt on sensitive issues such as your own health: “If there is a lawsuit or the like, we could be forced to issue these conversations. There is a legal privilege – medical confidentiality or legal confidence. The same concept should be given for discussions with AI.” What is silent about Altman: Openai itself can view user inputs in Chatgpt and use it for AI training, unless users actively object.
- Tatjana Schneeberger, psychologist at the German Research Center for Artificial Intelligencedoes not only look through the data glasses: “The answers that chatt gives do not always correspond to what experts would say in a therapy situation. For example, chatt usually encourages your own opinion.” A AI that specifically was developed for therapeutic purposesshe clears But good chances as support: “For a chat bot that you specifically build for therapy purposes, you naturally only use high -quality, curated data where experts have given inputs.”
- We want With a view to the therapy with Chatgpt, primarily warn of Ki-Halluzinations, because: “In the case of suggestions for cooking recipes, this may still be harmless, but plausible information that is still wrong can have fatal consequences in psychological crises. However, it is almost more frightening to document your self-therapy with chattgt via social media.”
Outlook: Chatgpt cannot replace a real therapist
AI models such as chatt can relieve and supplement the health system-for example through low-threshold offers or structured information. But they should Never give the impression that it can replace a real therapeutic relationship.
Because especially in psychotherapy, human closeness, real listening and individual assessment by specialist staff are irreplaceable.
What you are therefore doing always show Should be that AI is based on algorithms and thus on pre -defined action patterns. Chatgpt and Co. can therefore Do not recognize real emotions, show no real sympathy and, above all, replace no real people.
The Seems even Chatgpt: “I can have conversations, listen, ask questions, stimulate reflection – and sometimes that can help. But I am not a person, not a psychologist, no doctor. I have no awareness, no compassion in the real meaning, and no way to assess your condition professionally.”
Also interesting:
- New gas power plants: at full throttle into the fossil past
- New format, exclusive content: Update newsletter becomes an independent product
- From the dream: the large hydrogen error of the auto industry
- Irr Ki-Plan: Trump wants to rename artificial intelligence
The article Chatgpt as a therapist: Ki knows no confidentiality first appeared on Basic Thinking. Follow us too Google News and Flipboard Or subscribe to our update newsletter.
As a Tech Industry expert, I have mixed feelings about using ChatGPT as a therapist. While the AI technology certainly has the potential to provide support and guidance to those in need, there are significant ethical concerns that must be addressed.
One of the biggest issues with using ChatGPT as a therapist is the lack of confidentiality. Unlike a human therapist, AI does not have the ability to keep personal information private and secure. This could potentially lead to breaches of privacy and sensitive information being exposed.
Additionally, AI does not have the emotional intelligence and empathy that a human therapist possesses. While ChatGPT may be able to provide scripted responses and guidance, it lacks the ability to truly understand and connect with individuals on a deep emotional level.
Overall, while ChatGPT may have some potential as a tool for providing support and guidance, it should not be seen as a replacement for human therapists. It is important to consider the limitations and ethical concerns surrounding the use of AI technology in mental health settings.
Credits