The article Grokipedia: Elon Musk’s one-man opinion machine first appeared in the online magazine BASIC thinking. With our newsletter UPDATE you can start the day well informed every morning.
Wikipedia has long been a thorn in Elon Musk’s side. The Tesla boss accuses the free encyclopedia of political bias. With Grokipedia Musk therefore published a supposed alternative – paradoxically based on Wikipedia articles and with right-wing content. A commentary analysis.
How does Wikipedia work?
- Wikipedia is based on that Principle of a free encyclopedia. In principle, all users with internet access can create, edit or correct articles. In some cases registration is required. There are so-called sifters and administratorsreview the articles and changes and then approve them. There is a discussion page and history for each article.
- Elon Musk has been claiming for some time that Wikipedia is not objective and follow a political left-wing orientation. He mainly shoots against them Wikimedia Foundation. This operates Wikipedia using donations, but does not intervene in editorial content. Instead, content is provided by the community and local associations such as Wikimedia Germany e. v. created and monitored.
- Musk wants to use Grokipedia regularly right-wing populist expressionsestablish an alternative. In fact there are both Studieswhich demonstrate left-wing political content, as well as those which expose right-wing extremists. Both are due to the free principle of the encyclopedia. The community is happy according to his own statements Always have information about errors. Wikipedia contains 60 million articles, the first version of Grokipedia around 900,000 (As of October 28, 2025).
Grokipedia is not a Wikipedia alternative
Grokipedia is not a new knowledge project, but rather reflects social polarization. Because: Everything that does not correspond to your own opinion is all too often labeled by both the “left” and the “right”. Grokipedia follows this pigeonhole thinking.
Elon Musk’s main strategy: crude Wikipedia bashing. Grokipedia reveals an almost embarrassing paradox. The platform not only contains: Copies of Wikipedia articlesbut also right-wing conservative content.
Grokipedia is by no means an unbiased alternative. Elon Musk Instead, it colors controversies ideologically a. A strict separation between facts and opinion, which Wikipedia strives for, is missing.
Nevertheless, the parallels cannot be denied: Like Wikipedia, Grokipedia also lives from contributions from third parties, except that there is no community. Instead, Musk’s AI chatbot Grok is apparently used, which is already through right-wing content and anti-Semitic narratives noticed.
Voices
- The Wikipedia community has in hers Basic principles stated: “Wikipedia is not a rumor mill or a platform for advertising, propaganda or conspiracy theories. Articles must take a neutral standpoint. Controversial claims should be clearly documented as such.”
- Even if reality speaks a different language, it holds Elon Musk the first version of Grokipedia is already considered better than Wikipedia. In one Post on his platform X he advertises: “Grokipedia version 0.1 is now online. Version 1.0 will be ten times better, but even version 0.1 is, in my opinion, already better than Wikipedia.”
- Lauren Dickinson, spokesperson for the Wikimedia Foundationassumes that Grokipedia based on AI content: “Grokipedia needs Wikipedia to exist. Wikipedia’s non-profit independence – without advertising and without data sales – also distinguishes it from for-profit alternatives.”
Grokipedia: A one-man opinion machine
In the short term, Grokipedia is unlikely to be a serious competitor to Wikipedia. Because AI-generated content harbors hallucinations and errors, especially when it comes to current news. The platform is therefore likely to quickly lose trust.
An independent community is not foreseeable. Instead, Grokipedia is largely one One-man opinion machine. Musk’s interests are also likely to be financial in nature, i.e. profit-oriented.
Grokipedia is therefore becoming more of a vehicle for Data collection, for advertising and political campaigns be, because a neutral source of knowledge. The Wikipedia clone reveals a tension between technological progress and social responsibility.
Also interesting:
- Quantum Echos: Google is once again celebrating the quantum revolution
- More and more errors: AI can’t do news
- Vandalism against charging stations – an ideologically motivated act
- New e-car funding – just not for everyone
The post Grokipedia: Elon Musk’s one-man opinion machine appeared first on BASIC thinking. Follow us too Google News and Flipboard or subscribe to our newsletter UPDATE.
As a Tech Industry expert, I see Grokipedia as both an intriguing and concerning development. On one hand, Elon Musk’s vast knowledge and experience in various industries could potentially provide valuable insights and perspectives on a wide range of topics. However, the idea of one person essentially controlling a platform that disseminates information and opinions to a large audience raises questions about objectivity, bias, and accountability.
While Musk’s contributions to technology, innovation, and entrepreneurship are undeniable, it is important to remember that no one person has a monopoly on truth or expertise. The tech industry thrives on collaboration, diverse viewpoints, and critical thinking, and a platform like Grokipedia could potentially limit the diversity of voices and ideas that are essential for progress and innovation.
Ultimately, it will be important for Grokipedia to prioritize transparency, fact-checking, and open dialogue in order to ensure that it serves as a valuable source of information and discussion in the tech industry and beyond. As with any platform, it will be up to users to critically evaluate the content and perspectives presented on Grokipedia and engage in thoughtful discourse to continue pushing the boundaries of knowledge and innovation.
Credits