AI-generated content is increasing on the Internet – including in journalism. But a study has now revealed that many people view AI-generated headlines rather skeptically.
Since the introduction of ChatGPT, the topic of artificial intelligence has become an integral part of many areas of everyday life. The new technology does not stop at news journalism either.
This means that more and more AI-generated texts, images and even videos are being created, some of which are also used in the journalistic field. But how do consumers react to this AI-generated content? Researchers at the University of Zurich have looked into this question.
How do AI-generated headlines resonate with people?
The in the magazine PNAS Nexus published study comes from the scientists Sacha Altay and Fabrizio Gilardi. You conduct research at the Institute of Political Science at the University of Zurich.
For their study on AI-generated headlines in news journalism, the two researchers conducted two online experiments with around 5,000 participants. These came from the USA and the UK.
The goal was to determine the impact of labeling headlines as AI-generated. The test subjects had to rate 16 headlines that were either true, false, generated by AI or by humans.
The details of the experiments
The test subjects were randomly given headings to evaluate for the study. These were divided into one of the following categories:
- no headline is marked as AI-generated
- AI-generated headlines are marked as such
- Human-generated headlines are marked as AI-generated
- false headlines are marked as false
In particular, the headlines marked as AI-generated did not perform well with the test subjects. These were rated as less accurate.
In addition, the test subjects were less willing to pass on articles with AI-generated headlines. The latter stood out regardless of whether the headlines were true or false. It was also irrelevant whether the headlines were actually generated by AI or were just labeled as such.
What is the reason for the aversion to AI-generated headlines?
The researchers also investigated the question of what causes the rejection of AI-generated headlines. To do this, they experimentally manipulated the definition of these AI-generated headlines.
The scientists were able to find out that the rejection of AI can be traced back to a specific circumstance. Because people who see content as AI-generated assume that this content was created entirely without human intervention.
According to the authors of the study, caution is therefore advised when labeling AI content. This labeling could unintentionally have negative consequences. Therefore, more transparency regarding the meaning behind these labels is necessary in the future.
Also interesting:
- This AI can detect type 2 diabetes – just by voice
- Meta Smart Glasses: Students determine the identity of people on the street
- Do AI systems need warnings – like medications?
- This is how much electricity and water ChatGPT needs for a single email
The article According to the study: AI-generated headlines trigger skepticism by Maria Gramsch first appeared on BASIC thinking. Follow us too Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
As a Tech Industry expert, I believe that the study showing AI-generated headlines triggering skepticism is not surprising. AI has made significant advancements in natural language generation, but it still lacks the ability to truly understand human emotions and context. This can lead to headlines that come across as unnatural or insincere, causing readers to question their credibility.
To combat this skepticism, it is important for AI developers to continue refining their algorithms to better mimic human language and tone. Additionally, news organizations should disclose when headlines are generated by AI to maintain transparency with their audience.
Ultimately, while AI has the potential to revolutionize the way news is created and delivered, it is important to recognize its limitations and work towards building trust with readers through authentic and engaging content.
Credits