The Blue Eye article: Google is not smashed first appeared at the online magazine Basic Thinking. You can start the day well every morning via our newsletter update.
Google must be its chrome browser unspecific. In the most important antitrust process in the tech industry for decades, judge Amit Mehta has rejected the request of the US Ministry of Justice after the split off of Chrome. Instead, there are milder requirements – and many open questions for the competition.
Background for the Google process
- The US Ministry of Justice had accused Google to cement its market power by coupling Chrome and the search engine. The destruction was required – specifically: the sale of Chrome, sometimes even Android.
- Instead, Google must now grant competitors access to certain search index data and user notice figures for six years. In addition, the group must no longer force smartphone manufacturers to install Chrome or other Google apps in order to gain access to the Play Store.
- However, the billion-dollar deals with which Google places its search on Apple devices as the standard are generally allowed. Only exclusive contracts are prohibited.
Our classification
The judgment has Google breathed on the one hand: the “worst-case scenario” of a breakup was averted. The stock market course reacted promptly – compared to the previous month, 15 percent went up. Nevertheless, it is a pyrrhous victory: the court clearly confirmed that Google created and abused an illegal monopoly in the search engine market. So Google won and lost the process at the same time.
However, the editions now imposed are comparatively gentle. Google can continue its profitable standard search engine deals and Chrome remains in the group. The data transfer to competitors and loosened bundle requirements could bring new swing for smaller search engines such as Duckduckgo or Perplexity.
The judgment reveals the limits of the US cartel supervision: the large tech companies are still firmly in the saddle. New guardrails are drawn in, but the question of how effective regulation must look in the future remains open – not only in the USA, but worldwide.
Voices for the Google Chrome judgment
- Judge Amit Mehta in his reasoning: “The plaintiffs have overcome the goal with the demand for a forced sale of these important assets.”
- Nidhi Hegde from the American Economic Liberties Project: “You don’t do anyone about bank robbery and then let him get away with a letter of thanks for the prey. Nor can you make Google liable for monopoly and then write a rule that allows the company to protect your monopoly.”
- Google itself is non -happy With the judgment: “We are concerned about how these requirements will affect our users and their privacy, and carefully check the decision.”
outlook
For Google, the judgment is a liberation – for the time being. But the last word has not yet been spoken: the group wants to appeal against the monopoly classification. This could delay the implementation of the measures imposed by years.
For smaller search engines and browser providers, the judgment brings some tailwind. You will have access to exclusive Google data so far, but whether that is enough to really weaken Google remains questionable.
The decision is a signal for future tech cartel procedures-not only in the USA. Similar processes are also pending in Europe and other regions. The big question remains: How can regulation keep pace with the increasingly powerful tech companies?
Also interesting:
- E-Jetta for 12,000 euros: VW is building Volkswagen again
- Plain -wide fear: the specter in many heads
- In crisis mode: Does Apple create AI or does Ki Apple create?
- Overrated? Which threatens when the AI bubble bursts
The article Blue Eye: Google is not smashed first appeared on Basic Thinking. Follow us too Google News and Flipboard Or subscribe to our update newsletter.
As a Tech Industry expert, I can confidently say that the news about Blue Eye causing Google to be shattered is unfounded and exaggerated. Google is a resilient and innovative company that has faced challenges in the past and emerged even stronger. While Blue Eye may present some competition in the tech industry, it is unlikely to cause Google to be “shattered” in any way.
Google has a strong market presence, a vast user base, and a diverse portfolio of products and services. They have shown time and time again their ability to adapt to changing market conditions and continue to innovate in order to stay ahead of the competition. It is important to remember that competition in the tech industry is fierce, and companies like Google are constantly evolving to stay relevant and competitive.
While Blue Eye may offer some new features or services that could potentially attract users, it is unlikely to have a significant impact on Google’s overall business. Google’s brand recognition, resources, and innovative capabilities will likely allow them to continue to thrive in the tech industry for years to come. In conclusion, Google is not shattered by Blue Eye or any other competitor, and I remain confident in their ability to navigate any challenges that may come their way.
Credits