The article controversial US software: Palantir monitoring in Germany? First appeared at the online magazine Basic Thinking. You can start the day well every morning via our newsletter update.
Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt (CSU) checks a nationwide use of the surveillance software of the US group Palantir. The controversial analysis program is apparently the standard for German security authorities despite dubely connections and data protection concerns. Some federal states already use the Palantir software “Gotham”-albeit in a stripped-down form. In our format “Break the News” we decrypted the background.
Background: Palantir on the Software in Germany
- Palantir was founded in the United States in 2003-including by Tech billionaire and PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel, who for Legal conservative positions, his proximity to US President Donald Trump and his criticism of free democracies are known. Thiel is Chairman of the Board of Directors and large shareholder of Palantir. For him, freedom seems to be accompanied by the right that billionaires can rule over society.
- The Palantir software is a powerful data analysis platform that Using AI large and complex amounts of data from different sources and makes it analyzable. It is mainly used by authorities, secret services and companies to recognize patterns, evaluate risks and then make decisions. Palantir’s business model: create dependencies.
- There are Not an equivalent alternative to Palantir. Due to the pressure of investigation, terrorist defense and cybercrime, a solution is needed. With the program P20 Should actually arise – uniform nationwide. Problem: lack of political will and arguments at the country level. In short: because the Federal government creaking around in the digital nirvanayou go the light instead of the stony and right way.
Classification
Palantíri are Sighting stones From JRR Tolkien’s fantasy world “The Lord of the Rings”-and namesake of Peter Thiel’s US group. To determine that the disadvantages of the company’s surveillance software predominate, However, there was no glass ball.
Because while the politics is swimming with digital sovereignty, one wants to go to national security issues make dependent on a US group. Not to mention Peter Thiel’s fantasies of power – especially since it stands against all the values that make up a free and social democracy.
The fact that Palantir should only be used temporarily borders again Self -fraud. Because the company’s software solutions are so effective mainly because they enable different data structures to be combined. With that you create inevitably dependencies – whether you want or not.
Anyone who uses programs such as “Gotham” named after the city in the “Batman” comics in which the superhero goes on criminal hunting Do not fight crimes, but commits them.
Instead of promoting the debate about your own software solutionsyou open a new one. Ultimately, the supposedly easy way could be the rockier one – but it remains wrong.
Voices
- There is criticism not only from the opposition, but in the person of the Member of the Bundestag Johannes Schätz Also from its own coalition partner, the SPD: “Palantir is not a neutral IT service provider, but a company with deep connections to US secret services and clear geopolitical interests.” The ideaI think that the security authorities “dependent on a US company whose algorithms are non-transparent and that no democratic control in relation to data processing is subject”.
- The German police union (Dpolg) speaks for a use the Palantir software. “The times when security policy can maintain and increase their ideologies and data protection concerns are long gone. Rainer Wendt, chairman of the police union.
- Manuel Atug, expert for critical IT infrastructures and spokesman for the independent working group critical infrastructure, warned beforehand: “Our law enforcement authorities make themselves completely dependent on a group that acts ethically difficult to consider, where the investor and the CEO obviously run and also promote and optimize them.”
Outlook: Palantir monitoring in Germany
If Palantir prevails in Germany, there is a risk Data -driven surveillance state. Because: What is considered practical today and satisfies the human security needs could end up in a data protection albare tomorrow – especially in the wrong hands.
With Palantir, a US group would have access to the data from innocent people. Germany would also make itself dependent – and for Playball of people like Peter Thiel become.
On the one hand, using the monitoring software could ensure that the federal government continues to Makes digital hammock cozy And with the development of your own research and analysis platform, the actual project misses.
On the other hand, political and legal resistance are already inevitable. You could not only use the use of Restrict Palantir, but also drive the goal of a Europe -wide solution.
Ultimately, it is about the question of how much statehood digitization tolerates. And: whether the too often preached Digital sovereignty becomes a strategy or remains an ideal.
Also interesting:
- Chatgpt as a therapist: AI knows no confidentiality
- New format, exclusive content: Update newsletter becomes an independent product
- From the dream: the large hydrogen error of the auto industry
- Irr Ki-Plan: Trump wants to rename artificial intelligence
The article controversial US software: Palantir monitoring in Germany? First appeared on Basic Thinking. Follow us too Google News and Flipboard Or subscribe to our update newsletter.
As a Tech Industry expert, I have mixed feelings about Palantir’s monitoring activities in Germany. On one hand, I understand the importance of monitoring software in maintaining security and preventing potential threats. However, the controversy surrounding Palantir’s data collection and privacy practices raises concerns about the potential misuse of the technology.
Germany has strict data protection laws, and any foreign company operating in the country must comply with these regulations. Palantir’s history of working with government agencies and controversial organizations has raised red flags for many, leading to questions about the company’s ethics and motives.
It is crucial for Palantir to be transparent about its monitoring activities in Germany and ensure that they are in compliance with local laws and regulations. As technology continues to advance, it is important for companies like Palantir to prioritize privacy and data protection to build trust with the public and maintain ethical standards in their operations.
Credits