The contribution fear: The fright specter in many heads first appeared at the online magazine Basic Thinking. You can start the day well every morning via our newsletter update.
Too low ranges and a lack of charging infrastructure are the most common arguments against electromobility. At least the so -called range of range is now considered outdated, but still haunts in many heads. A current analysis shows: E-car drivers use just 23 percent of their available range on average.
Background: The fear of ranges specters
- The so-called fear of range is the fear that the range of electric cars could not be sufficient for many trips, or that one remains with the electric car. It is still a main argument against a purchase – even if reality speaks a different language. In the meantime, however, more precise terms have been established such as fear of hanging or reach.
- One analysis The E-Autoplattform Reccurent shows that e-car drivers scrape the range potential of their vehicles in everyday life. Contrary to the opinion of the auto industry, the costs of the popularity of electric cars are not ranged, but the costs.
- A current one Practical test The DEKRA shows that the batteries of many electric cars last longer than stated by the manufacturers. This derives the test organization from 25,000 so-called “state-of-health” tests, which have been carried out using an in-house fast test process.
Classification: Reach actually no longer a problem
The fear of the range is still haunted in many heads. The range of modern electric cars is usually no longer a problem or even counter argument – at most a mental one.
Admittedly, the charging infrastructure is still lagging behind in some regions, but improves steadily – even if battery technology sometimes makes faster progress than politics.
A burner cannot be “refuel” at home or directly on the street. And although e-cars are now planning almost independently, including long-haul routes, two possible vacations often speak against a purchase every year-presumably also because irrationality sells better in the media.
The greatest inhibition is the price. Not when buying, but when refueling. Because: Uniformly regulated prices when charging-without tariffs or subscriptions-e-mobility would make e-mobility more attractive and dismantle abstract fears such as fear of reach.
Voices
- Thomas Franke, professor of engineering psychologyholds the Avestment to reach for unfounded: “Our relationship with the car is not rational. It is interesting that most people look at the reach. Actually, the loading time is much more exciting. Both range and charging power are increasing continuously. The fact that people buy large cars just because they have a lot to transport twice a year shows how irrational a car buying can be.”
- Also according to Maximilian Fichtner, one of the most renowned German battery researchers, Is range No more argument against electromobility: “Well, in China there are the first models on the market that create 1,000 kilometers with a cargo – and a payload for 600 to 700 kilometers in ten or twelve minutes. It is important that you can load quickly, that is the decisive factor. The combustion engines have no unlimited ranges.”
- Wolfgang Weber, head of the Association of Electrical and Digital Technologyspeaks more of one String: “More than 50 percent of the households that cannot imagine the purchase of an electric car mean an inadequate public charging infrastructure as the reason.” It not only needs more loading points and lower prices for electricity, but also “more cost transparency when tinkering with electricity”.
Outlook: fear of reach has been dumped
The fear of the range is likely to have spread out in the coming years. Because: The actual problem is fewer electric cars or their batteries, but the heads that still think in combustion mode.
In the meantime, no longer the fear of reality, but the fear of something new. The same applies to the price and environmental balance. Because electric cars continue to pick up at the purchase price.
In the environmental balance sheet, they have been on the hard shoulder – battery production for two years now. However, the fear of hanging should remain a passenger for a little longer. But the denser the infrastructure becomes, the more this gumps.
Also interesting:
- In crisis mode: Does Apple create AI or does Ki Apple create?
- Technophobia? The AI resistance grows
- Overrated? Which threatens when the AI bubble bursts
- A AI goes to the doctor; Diagnosis: algorithm disorders
The contribution of the reach: The specter in many heads first appeared on Basic Thinking. Follow us too Google News and Flipboard Or subscribe to our update newsletter.
As a Tech Industry expert, I understand the concerns and fears surrounding the idea of Plain-wide fear. In today’s interconnected world, where information spreads rapidly and can be manipulated easily, it is understandable that people are worried about the potential consequences of widespread fear being propagated online.
One of the biggest challenges in addressing Plain-wide fear is the spread of misinformation and fake news. With the rise of social media and online platforms, it has become easier for false information to be disseminated and for fear to be stoked among the masses. This can lead to panic, irrational behavior, and even violence in extreme cases.
As a Tech Industry expert, I believe that it is important for technology companies to take responsibility for the content that is shared on their platforms and to work towards promoting accurate information and combating misinformation. This can be done through the use of algorithms, fact-checking tools, and partnerships with reputable sources.
Additionally, it is crucial for individuals to be vigilant and critical of the information they consume online. By fact-checking sources, verifying information, and not spreading unverified claims, we can all play a role in combating Plain-wide fear and promoting a more informed and rational society.
Overall, the specter of Plain-wide fear is a real concern in today’s digital age, but with the right approach and collaboration between technology companies, individuals, and policymakers, we can work towards minimizing its impact and promoting a more positive online environment.
Credits