The post Trump is turning off the power of Anthropic AI – with consequences for Europe appeared first in the online magazine BASIC thinking. With our newsletter UPDATE you can start the day well informed every morning.
The US government has ordered Anthropic to block access to its most powerful AI models. The trigger was apparently a tip from Amazon boss Andy Jassy about a security gap. There are now also indications of Chinese access to one of the models. However, Anthropic criticizes the US government’s actions. For Europe, the incident reveals an uncomfortable truth: Anyone who is dependent on US providers for AI can lose access overnight. A commentary analysis.
Why the US government made Anthropic shut down its AI models
- Following an order from the US government, Anthropic has cut off access to its new top AI models. The company shared in a statement with the fact that authorities ordered that access to the Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models be prevented for all non-Americans. The reason was unspecified Threat to national security referred. Since it was not technically possible to block access to individual nations, the company pulled the plug worldwide. According to Anthropic, the government has become aware of a method that can be used to circumvent restrictions in AI software.
- Like that Wall Street Journal Reportedly, a phone call is said to have triggered the ban. Accordingly, Amazon boss Andy Jassy called US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and other government representatives and pointed out a technical problem. Researchers at the company are said to have discovered that a certain sequence of prompts could cause Anthropic’s AI models to reveal security-related information. What was apparently initially intended as a warning triggered a chain reaction. US President Donald Trump apparently even personally approved the measure – despite internal concerns about economic damage.
- Just a few days after the lockdown was ordered, further details came to light. Like that US magazine Semafor citing an insider, it is not just the alleged jailbreak that is behind the US government’s order. Rather, there are indications that one Group with ties to the Chinese government had access to Claude Mythos. An official confirmation is pending. However, that would explain why two AI models were banned. The previously confirmed security hole is said to only affect Fable 5.
What the Anthropic lockdown means for Europe
The US ban on Anthropic acts like a geopolitical stress test for Europe’s digital policy. Unfortunately he is no exercise. When presenting its Mythos model, Anthropic itself pointed out that its capabilities could be misused, for example to detect security gaps in software. But what began as a well-intentioned warning about real risks has become an argument for a global access ban.
The question is not necessarily how dangerous the technology is, but rather who gets to decide who can use it. For Europe the process sets an unpleasant dependency open. Because: For the most powerful AI models, the crucial infrastructure predominantly comes from the USA. But: If a political decision in Washington is enough to deprive researchers, companies or authorities in Europe of access to important tools, a technology issue suddenly becomes a question of sovereignty.
The longing for our own top-of-the-line European models is therefore not just an industrial policy vision, but also the desire sober damage limitation. There is therefore growing concern in Brussels that not only AI systems, but also cloud services, chips and digital infrastructures could be used as geopolitical leverage in the future.
The planned European sovereignty package is therefore more than just another strategy paper. The actual test will be whether Europe acts faster this time when analyzing new dependencies. Because digital independence cannot be downloaded. Someone has to develop them.
Voices
- After Anthropic complained about the US government’s actions due to a lack of transparency and too short a deadline for action, Anthropic responded Pentagon spokeswoman Kirsten Davies in one Post on X (formerly Twitter): “We fully stand with @POTUS and @SecWar in prioritizing national security and the safety of our service members, our defense and security partners, critical infrastructure, and our international partners and allies. Some things are just more important than revenue cycles, clickbait, and pre-IPO valuations. America First. Always.”
- Ralf Wintergerst, President of the digital association Bitkomin one statement: “Germany and Europe are dependent on the goodwill of the US government for access to the strongest AI models, as the surprising order at the weekend made this more than clear. This has a direct impact on the performance of our traditional industries and our administrations and also affects our security and, for example, the excellence of our science. Now more than ever, it must be about making Germany and Europe digitally sovereign. Digital sovereignty and our own AI competencies belong at the top of the political priorities.”
- Also Rasmus Rothe, Chairman of the Federal AI Associationbeats in one LinkedIn statement in a similar vein: “What we experienced yesterday is no surprise, it is the receipt for years of hesitation. The US government has proven what we have been saying since 2021: AI is strategic infrastructure. Anyone who does not control it themselves will be controlled by others. We are not demanding another strategy process. We are demanding a summit. Now.”
IPOs, Geopolitics and Sovereignty: What’s at Stake
For Anthropic, the US government’s order comes as one extremely bad timing. The company filed confidential documents for an IPO just a few weeks ago and now has to justify itself to its investors and explain why two of its most important AI models disappeared from the market overnight.
Anthropic itself is currently assessing the alleged trigger for the ban significantly less dramatic than the US authorities. It was only a limited possibility of using AI to analyze and correct certain program codes. It is questionable whether this actually created or could have created a national security threat.
At the same time, Trump’s order is part of a longer history of conflict. Because Anthropic had repeatedly objected to the use of its systems autonomous weapon systems and for mass surveillance and thereby created powerful opponents in Washington. There is currently no reliable evidence that the current ban is politically motivated. But the case shows how closely economic interests, security issues and government intervention are intertwined in the AI age.
In other words: whoever controls the models increasingly also controls the rules of the game. The Consequences also reach far beyond Anthropic. Companies, research institutions and administrations are increasingly building their processes on powerful AI systems. If access is suddenly lost, not only technical but also economic damage will occur – for both domestic and foreign users.
That’s exactly why The EU Commission is monitoring developments closely and reiterates the need for technological sovereignty. The lesson could be that AI is no longer just ordinary software. It is developing into a strategic infrastructure – and thus into a resource that can be just as hotly contested in times of crisis as energy, raw materials or trade routes.
Also interesting:
- Who is actually speaking here? The inconvenient truth about AI in politics
- SpaceX IPO makes Musk a trillionaire – in the highest castle in the air of all time
- The next lame authority? What is behind the AI Institute for Germany
- Apple is racing to catch up: Siri AI is supposed to bring AI magic to the iPhone
The post Trump is cutting off the power of Anthropic AI – with consequences for Europe appeared first on BASIC thinking. Follow us too Google News and Flipboard or subscribe to our newsletter UPDATE.
As a tech industry expert, I am deeply concerned about the consequences of Trump cutting off the power of Anthropic AI for Europe. Anthropic AI has the potential to revolutionize industries, improve efficiency, and enhance our quality of life. By restricting access to this technology, Trump is not only hindering progress in the tech industry but also putting Europe at a competitive disadvantage.
The decision to cut off the power of Anthropic AI will have far-reaching consequences for Europe, as it could slow down innovation, reduce competitiveness, and limit economic growth. Without access to cutting-edge AI technology, European companies may struggle to keep up with their global counterparts and may miss out on the opportunities that AI can offer.
Furthermore, cutting off the power of Anthropic AI could also have negative implications for European consumers, who may miss out on the benefits of AI-driven products and services. From healthcare to transportation to finance, AI has the potential to transform every aspect of our lives, and restricting access to this technology could limit the opportunities for Europeans to benefit from these advancements.
In conclusion, Trump’s decision to cut off the power of Anthropic AI will have serious consequences for Europe, limiting innovation, slowing economic growth, and restricting access to the benefits of AI technology. It is essential that European leaders work to find alternative solutions to ensure that their countries can continue to benefit from the potential of AI.
Credits